Legal Opinion
Eads v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1989No. 70627PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANS, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from the order of the trial court which dismissed his lawsuit because of improper venue. Having reviewed the record and applicable law, we reverse and remand.
Plaintiff was employed as a field representative for Defendant Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society in September 1984. Pursuant to his employment, he signed a written contract with Defendant. On April 3, 1986, he signed a second contract virtually identical to the first employment contract. Eads signed a third employment contract with Defendant, effective July 1, 1986, in which the following…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Lfc Lessors, Inc. v. Pacific Sewer Maintenance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Central Contracting Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Barnes v. HelfenbeinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cal-State Business Products & Services, Inc. v. RicohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- National Diversified Business Services, Inc. v. Corporate Financial Opportunities, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Titan Indemnity Co. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- O'BRIEN ENGINEERING CO. v. Continental MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.