Legal Opinion

United States v. Bradshaw

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 25, 2002No. 00-2416PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

The poetess Nikki Giovanni once commented that: “Mistakes are a fact of life. It is the response to the error that counts.” Elaine Partnow, The Quotable Woman: 1800-1981 453 (1983). Defendant-appellant Joseph Bradshaw, a recidivist robber, would have done well to heed the message inherent in these words of wisdom. The tale follows.

In the court below, the government charged that the appellant repeated and compounded the error of his ways. A jury agreed, convicting him on an array of charges, including armed robbery and attempted murder. Invoking the “Three Strikes Law,” 18…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. United States v. Ofray-CamposCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Vernon Snype, Marisa HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Perez-RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. PiperCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API