McFarland v. Cordiero
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. Thereafter she filed a first amended complaint. To that pleading the defendant interposed a demurrer. The demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff failed to amend and judgment was entered in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed and has brought up the judgment-roll.
The appeal presents the single question as to whether or not the plaintiff’s action, at least in part, is barred by the statute of limitations. In her amended complaint the plaintiff alleged that on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Spence v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Correia v. SantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Ridley v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FabianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Franceschi v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.