Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Grand Nat. Bank

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided February 20, 1933No. 9716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAYIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff issued bankers’ blanket bonds, aggregating $150,000, by which it agreed to indemnify defendant against loss of money or securities through robbery. On May 25, 1930, the bank was robbed of cash and securities of a value of about $824,000. The portion of the property covered by the indemnity bonds was the cash amounting to $46,895.82, and bonds of the value of $236,-950. Proof of loss was filed, and on September 19, 1930, the plaintiff settled the claim by paying to defendant $125,000.

Subsequently the bonds, but not the cash, were returned. Plaintiff brings this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Duane v. Merchants Legal Stamp Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Primeau v. GranfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kansas City Operating Corp. v. DurwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Kansas City Operating Corporation v. DurwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API