Legal Opinion

Tabb v. Mallette

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Garnishment. Before Judge Barrow. Chatham superior court. July 8, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

Mrs. A. R. Mallette sued E. C. Tabb in a justice’s court, and, upon filing her affidavit and bond, caused a summons of garnishment to be issued and served on the Central of Georgia Railway Company. The garnishee answered that it was indebted to the defendant in a named sum, which was due to him for his monthly wages as a laborer, and that such wages were exempt from the process and liabilities of garnishment. The defendant also filed his answer, claiming that all money owing him by the garnishee had been earned by him as a day laborer while in its employment. The issues formed on the answers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. McLellan v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Leake & Vandivander v. LaceySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Holt v. ExperienceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zipperer v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Pounds v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Howell v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Christie v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Bright v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API