Leake & Vandivander v. Lacey
Supreme Court of Georgia
Mandamus. Before Judge Janes. Polk superior court. February term, 1894.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
This case turns upon the question whether or not a municipal corporation is subject to the process of- garnishment sued .out for the purpose of reaching a sum of money due by the mayor and council to a contractor who had constructed a public sewer.
It could scarcely be doubted that if the public work was uncompleted, a creditor.of the contractor could not, by garnishment, cut off" payments which would otherwise be made by the municipal Authorities to the contractor as the work progressed. It is obvious that if this were allowed, it might, and in most cases would, seriously…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Connolly v. Thurber Whyland Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
3Cited by12 opinions
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Morgan v. RustSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Tabb v. MalletteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- McConnell v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- City of Albany v. LynchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.