Legal Opinion

Poenisch v. Quarnstrom

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1962No. A-8903PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an action of trespass to try title and for partition arising from a complicated factual situation. The legal question involved relates generally to the question of notice to co-tenants and notice to owners of property after the rendition of a judgment against persons remaining in possession, and the effect that such notice or lack thereof has upon the running of the ten-year real property statute of limitations, Article 5512, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats. A judgment generally favorable to the defendant, Mamie Quarnstrom, also known as Marie Ottman Quarnstrom, the limitation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bruni v. VidaurriTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Clayton v. HurtTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Stiles v. HawkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  4. Phillipson v. FlynnTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Moody v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1885

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. BP America Production Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Todd v. BrunerTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. UMLIC VP LLC v. T & M Sales & Environmental Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  4. Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
  5. BP America Production Co. v. Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API