Legal Opinion
Darr Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 12, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.1
Darr Construction Company and its workers’ compensation carrier, Roekwood Casualty Insurance Company (together, Employer), petition for review of five orders of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which amended five separate referee decisions regarding Employer’s subrogation interest in the civil settlements of Richard Walker, Donald Reed, James Walker, Neil Rayman and Donald Ziegler (collectively, Claimants). Claimants filed cross-petitions for review of the same Board orders.2 All petitions were consolidated by this court.
I
The facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hopkins v. BlancoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Shimabuku v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Emanuel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. v. RoyseDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2000
- Stalmaster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Kochie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (F.D.I.B.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997