Legal Opinion
Stalmaster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
John Stalmaster (Claimant) petitions for review of the March 17, 1995 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming its May 17, 1994 order of subrogation, but modifying that order to include Claimant’s deduction for legal costs.
On December 12, 1983, Claimant was injured in an automobile accident while working as a bus driver for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (Employer). Pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, Claimant received compensation at the maximum weekly rate of $306. *295Claimant then initiated a third-party action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Dasconio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- North Philadelphia Aviation Center v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monessen, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- J. Lewis v. WCAB (Fastrack Construction, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016