Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Warburg
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 15, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph A. Cox, S.
At the time of the marriage of the testatrix and her husband Max Warburg, they were residents of Hamburg, Germany, a jurisdiction which recognized community property interests. The husband was a. general partner in a private banking firm and it is recognized that this partnership interest was community property. The spouses also owned parcels of *998real estate and personal property which were community property.
In 1938, by reason of the Hitler program of persecution of Jews, the testatrix’ husband disposed of his assets in the banking firm for an inadequate compensation and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Will of FowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- In re the Accounting of KeyserlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In Re the Accounting of LockeNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re the Appointment of an Ancillary Successor Trustee under the Will of GoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of PrinceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
- In re the Estate of MurphyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972