Legal Opinion

Pope v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 2003No. A03A0195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

Claiming that a dental procedure resulted in permanent damage to his lingual nerve, Richard Pope sued James Davis, D.D.S. and James Davis, D.D.S., P.C. (collectively Davis), alleging malpractice, negligence per se, and battery based on Davis’ alleged failure to obtain Pope’s consent to the procedure. Davis moved for partial summary judgment on the battery and negligence per se claims, arguing that Pope signed a general consent form prior to allowing the treatment and that no other form was required, that Pope also gave implied consent to the particular treatment, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ketchup v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Smith v. LuckettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Pullen v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paden v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Roberts v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Pruette v. UngarinoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Jeri v. PruetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API