Legal Opinion

Paden v. Rudd

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 2008No. A08A1536PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

Wanda A. Paden appeals the trial court’s dismissal of her battery claims. We affirm, for reasons that follow.

“ ‘When reviewing the grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we review the dismissal de novo, construing the complaint’s allegations and all possible inferences therefrom in favor of the plaintiff.’ ” So viewed, the record shows that Paden sued dentist Sherry Rudd and Jerry E. Nutt, D.D.S., PC. d/b/a Douglas-ville Dental Group Practice, claiming that a root canal procedure left her permanently injured. Rudd moved for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Albany Urology Clinic, P.C. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Smith v. AdamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Studard v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. MCG Health, Inc. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Hall v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cawthon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  2. Guilford v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Fortson v. HotardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF AUGUSTA, LLC Et Al. v. ALICEACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. J. N. Legacy Group, Inc. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API