Smith v. Luckett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Chief Judge.
C. Winfred Smith and his wife brought a medical malpractice suit against the defendant alleging that Dr. Luckett had negligently performed a venogram upon Judge Smith and that he had also committed a battery because the procedure was done without consent. Mrs. Smith claimed damages for loss of consortium. Appeal is brought by the Smiths following the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of the defendant.
1. The trial court did not err in granting a directed verdict as to the issue of battery. The record shows that Mrs. Smith signed the consent form authorizing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mims v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Kuttner v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Fain v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Washington v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Hawkins v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Barham v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Bhansali v. MoncadaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Fox v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.