Legal Opinion
Tompkins v. Hale
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings, under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the denials contained in the answer raise no issue of fact and that the affirmative defenses are insufficient as a matter of law.
In the complaint plaintiff alleges that she is a stockholder of the defendant corporation and a tenant-owner of premises 1165 Fifth avenue, New York city, owned by it. The corporation was formed for the purpose of taking title to, controlling and operating the premises as a co-operative apartment dwelling. Prospective purchasers were induced to purchase…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Penthouse Properties, Inc. v. 1158 Fifth Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. SteinhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by16 opinions
- Susskind v. 1136 Tenants Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Vernon Manor Co-operative Apartments, Section I, Inc. v. Salatino, New York County Courts1958
- Hicks v. BigelowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Stockton v. LucasTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1973
- 1915 16TH ST. CO-OP. ASS'N v. PinkettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.