Legal Opinion

Orino v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1948No. 46063PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittRetoN, Judge

Plaintiff seeks to recover on three separate items of claim arising out of a contract for the construction of an irrigation canal on. the Deschutes River near the city of Bend, Oregon.

*513In the bidding documents the contract work was described as “Earth Work and Structures Station 28+24 to Station 110+00 North Unit Main Canal.” The work was divisible into two parts, namely, the portion consisting of the approach channel and headwork structures at the upstream or river end of the canal to station 28+24 and the portion consisting principally of the unlined canal downstream to station 110+00.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Loftis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  3. Garrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Ruff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  5. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clemens Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  2. Clemens Construction Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API