Legal Opinion
State of Alaska v. Petronia
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1966No. 38086PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in four consolidated cases by the Superior Court for King County. These actions were instituted by the attorney general of the state of Alaska under our reciprocal tax collection statute, RCW 4.24.140, for the enforcement of the payment by certain merchant seamen of income taxes asserted to be owed to the state of Alaska.
Of the four defendant (appellant) seamen, Walter Petro- nia, Morris K. Nainoa and Charles Frankie are residents of the state of Washington, and John W. Massey is a resident of the state of Oregon. All, however, were covered by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- American Commuters Association v. LevittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Sjong v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Blangers v. Dept. of Revenue & TaxationIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Pacific Diamond Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.