Legal Opinion
American Commuters Association v. Levitt
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 19, 1967No. 67 Civ. 2534PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move for an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284 convening a three-judge court, and defendants Mario A. Procaccino, individually and as Comptroller of the City of New York; Roy M. Goodman, individually and as Director of Finance of the City of New York; other officials of the City of New York; the members of the New York City Board of Higher Education; and the members of the New York City Board of Education, move for an order pursuant to Rule 12(b), F.R.Civ.P., dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint. 1 Plaintiffs’ motion is denied and defendants’…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Janice Abele v. Arnold MarkleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- American Commuters Association, Inc. v. Arthur Levitt, Individually and as Comptroller of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Kirk v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Crossen v. BreckenridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.