Legal Opinion

State v. Strong

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 16, 1988PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

HANDLER, J.

This appeal requires the Court to determine the scope of the limited immunity from prosecution under N.J.S.A. 2A:81-17.3. This prohibits the State from using evidence against a person that is “directly or indirectly derived” from his own compelled testimony. Defendant, Michael Strong, contends that he was indicted on evidence derived from testimony that he was compelled to give in exchange for a grant of limited immunity under this statute. This, he claims, violates his right not to incriminate himself as guaranteed by both the fifth…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. State v. BaroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. State v. MuhammadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. State v. DrurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API