Legal Opinion
Orthoflex, Inc. v. Thermotek, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided October 31, 2013No. Civil Action Nos. 3:11-CV-0870-D, 3:10-CV-2618-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*869 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Chief Judge.
*This memorandum opinion and order was filed unsealed on November 18, 2013 after the parties agreed that no part needed to remain under seal.
Motion Medical Technologies, LLC (“Motion Medical”), Wabash Medical Company, LLC (“Wabash Medical”), Mike Wilford (‘Wilford”), Thermo Compression Solutions, LLC (“TCS, LLC”), and Tri 3 Enterprises, LLC (“Tri 3”)1 move for summary judgment dismissing the claims of ThermoTek, Inc. (“ThermoTek”) for breach of contract, fraud, and unfair competition. For the reasons that follow, the court grants…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BCC Merchant Solutions, Inc. v. Jet Pay, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
- Orthoflex, Inc. v. ThermoTek, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
- Anderson v. Octapharma Plasma IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
- Christoph Henkel v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
- Romo v. Waste Connections US Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.