Legal Opinion

Burkett v. AM. GENERAL FINANCE

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 31, 1992No. 1901934PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants, Ronald E. and Charlotte Burkett, appeal from the denial of their alternative motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial, or for the trial court to alter, amend, or vacate a judgment. This judgment was one entered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, American General Finance, Inc., based on a jury's answers to special interrogatories.

We note, at the outset, that the factual background of this case is exceedingly complex; it involves numerous conveyances, numerous individuals and entities, and at least 10 transactions relating to real estate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stallings v. Angelica Uniform Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Ensor v. WILSON BY AND THROUGH WILSONSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte TidmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Huskey v. W. B. Goodwyn Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Employers Cas. Co. v. HagendorferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Systrends, Inc. v. GROUP 8760, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Blackmon v. Nexity Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. Swanstrom v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API