Burkett v. AM. GENERAL FINANCE
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants, Ronald E. and Charlotte Burkett, appeal from the denial of their alternative motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial, or for the trial court to alter, amend, or vacate a judgment. This judgment was one entered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, American General Finance, Inc., based on a jury's answers to special interrogatories.
We note, at the outset, that the factual background of this case is exceedingly complex; it involves numerous conveyances, numerous individuals and entities, and at least 10 transactions relating to real estate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stallings v. Angelica Uniform Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Ensor v. WILSON BY AND THROUGH WILSONSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte TidmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Huskey v. W. B. Goodwyn Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Employers Cas. Co. v. HagendorferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Systrends, Inc. v. GROUP 8760, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Blackmon v. Nexity Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Swanstrom v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.