Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Tidmore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 20, 1982No. 81-751PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole issue presented by this petition for writ of mandamus is whether the trial court abused its discretion in disallowing an amended complaint. We hold that, under the facts of this case, it did not, and we deny the petition.

Plaintiff/petitioner filed suit on November 5, 1980, alleging invasion of privacy against The Tuscaloosa News, Inc., a corporation, Atlanta Newspapers, a corporation, The Birmingham Post Company, a corporation, The Advertiser Company, a corporation, Bill Berkeley, and Howell Raines. No fictitious party defendants were named or described. The suit was based upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stead v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Stallings v. Angelica Uniform Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Walker v. TraughberCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. McElrath v. Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Kuhlman v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Boros v. BaxleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. McWilliams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Neelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Burkett v. AM. GENERAL FINANCESupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Denney v. SerioSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API