Legal Opinion

Todd Protectograph Co. v. New Era Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1916No. 1567PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Todd Protectograph Company against the New Era Manufacturing Company. Sur motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This case and applied rulings may be thus formulated:

[1] Rights granted by letters patent, whose validity has been adjudged by the courts, should thereafter be recognized and enforced within the limitations of the necessary exceptions. There are no facts in this case which, on a motion for preliminary injunction, exclude this defendant from the operation of the general rule. The plaintiff was granted through the Patent Office the rights given by law to advance the policy of promoting invention by the stimulation of self-interest. The rights thus given were adjudged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitaker v. ToddCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. France Mfg. Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  2. Waterbury Buckle Co. v. G. E. Prentice Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1923
  3. Hedman Mfg. Co. v. Todd Protectograph Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
  4. Todd Protectograph Co. v. Hedman Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1919
  5. Perfect Tailboards, Patented v. Biltwell Auto Body Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API