Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Arzt

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 7, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The court has before it three motions:

First, the defendant, Blossom Products Corp. seeks to quash the alleged service of the summons upon it;

Second, defendants, B. Charles Gould, Nat Baumgart and Ohrbachs, Inc., have moved to vacate and set aside their respective defaults in failing to serve and file their answer within the prescribed time;

Third, said defendants also affirmatively move to compel the plaintiff herein to post security for costs.

Service of the summons and complaint upon defendant, Blossom Products Corp., was effected by delivering a copy of the summons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goetz v. Interlake S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutton v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Metropolitan Theatre Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  3. Hutton v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API