Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Theatre Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
These are motions by the defendant, C. & F. Theatre Co., hereinafter referred to as C. & F., to quash service of the summons and complaint, to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that C. & F. was not transacting business within this District within the meaning of Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 22, and to vacate a notice by the plaintiff to take depositions in connection with plaintiff’s request for a hearing on the motion to dismiss.
This is an action under the anti-trust laws. Sixteen of the twenty named defendants were served in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mechanical Appliance Co. v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Thomas v. Furness (Pacific) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blair v. City of WorcesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Rutter v. Louis Dreyfus CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Klishewich v. Mediterranean Agencies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1966
- Frederick Cinema Corp. v. Interstate Theatres Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1976