Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1979No. Appeal, No. 885 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

This appeal, from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review holding petitioner-claimant ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits due to a discharge for willful misconduct,1 raises the recurring issue of whether the intentional violation of an employer’s direct order or policy is willful misconduct under Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81, 351 A.2d 631 (1976) and its progeny.

Frumento held that the employee’s reason for noncompliance with an employer’s rule must be balanced against the reasonableness of the rule;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Holomshek v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Wilkerson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gillins v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. County of Luzerne v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. City of Beaver Falls v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Partsch v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Doyle v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API