Legal Opinion
Witco Chemical Corporation, Etc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Peachtree Doors, Inc., Etc., Mobay Chemical Corp., Etc., Appellants/cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 24, 1986No. Appeal 85-972, 85-1453PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISSELL, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment, after a jury trial, entered on December 4, 1984, amended December 10, 1984, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, holding Witco Chemical Corporation’s (Witco) U.S. Patent Nos. 3,846,347 (’347) and 4,248,975 (’975) (collectively called Witco’s patents) not invalid and infringed by foam-forming systems and prepolymers sold by Mobay Chemical Corporation (Mobay) and used by Peachtree Doors, Inc. (Peachtree). We vacate the judgment and remand for a new trial.
I. BACKGROUND
THE INVENTIONS
The Witco patents…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- George G. Santa Maria v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Union Carbide Chems. & Plastics Tech. Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- Jessop v. HardmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.