Legal Opinion

Fortino Alvarez v. Randy Tracy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 8, 2014No. 12-15788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge N.R. Smith; Dissent by Judge Kozinski.

OPINION

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge;

A petitioner’s failure to exhaust a claim brought under the Indian Civil Rights Act (the “ICRA”), 25 U.S.C. § 1303, does not deprive the federal court of subject matter jurisdiction. Iowa Mid. Ins. Co. v. LaPlante, 480 U.S. 9, 16 n. 8, 107 S.Ct. 971, 94 L.Ed.2d 10 (1987); Grand Canyon Skywalk Dev., LLC v. ‘Sa’ Nyu Wa Inc., 715 F.3d 1196, 1200 (9th Cir.2013); Selam v. Warm Springs Tribal Corr. Facility, 134 F.3d 948, 953 (9th Cir.1998). Nevertheless, exhaustion under the *1013ICRA is a “prerequisite to a federal…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fortino Alvarez v. Randy TracyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Pacino v. OliverDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. United States v. Lajai PridgetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API