Federal Kemper Insurance v. Brown
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Federal Kemper Insurance Company [Kemper] initiated the present lawsuit asserting that it was entitled, as a matter of law, to rescind an automobile liability policy issued to Appellee Carl W. Brown, and also to avoid liability under the policy to innocent third-party accident victims, Appel-lees Virgil V. Robinson and the Estate of Leonard Walker. We agree, and therefore, reverse and remand with instructions that judgment be entered in favor of Kemper.
FACTS
The facts in the light most favorable to the appellees reveal that in March of 1992, Brown…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. AlterovitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Pickel v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Stump v. Indiana Equipment Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Madison County Bank & Trust Co. v. KreegarIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. PriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. BloomIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Jesse v. American Community Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.