State Ex Rel. Metropolitan Transportation Services, Inc. v. Meyers

This original proceeding in mandamus presents the question of whether a circuit judge can reject a defendant’s proposed examining physician without expressing a legal reáson when the judge has determined pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 60.01(a) that the plaintiff’s physical condition is in controversy and physical examination of the plaintiff is appropriate.

Relator filed its application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to vacate his order denying relator’s motion filed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 60.01(a) to require plaintiff to submit to a physical examination by Dr. Joseph…