Legal Opinion
Nitto Boseki Co. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 6, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-870-JLLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
This suit was brought pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 1461 for review of a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences (“Board”). Briefly stated,2 the contest is over priority of invention of a method and apparatus for making glass fibers. The plaintiff, owner of a patent3 for the method and apparatus, and the defendant, the owner of a competing patent application,4 were both dissatisfied with the Board’s decision which split the award of priority on the three counts in interference. The plaintiff timely filed this action, seeking reversal of that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Standard Oil Co. v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd. v. Owens-Corning FiberglasDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- Askanase v. FatjoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993