Griffin v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of gaming, and fined $10.

The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “Did then and there unlawfully play at a game with cards in a public place, to wit, a gaming house.” The motion to quash on the ground of insufficiency is-not well taken. Thorp v. State, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 231.

The first bill of exceptions is reserved to the refusal of the court-to permit appellant to prove by himself and other witnesses that he was summoned before the grand jury and testified in regard to this transaction, and gave information and testimony in regard…