Legal Opinion
United States v. Tapio
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 12, 1998No. Civ.97-3053; CR 96-30067PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND'RECOMMENDATIONS
KORNMANN, District Judge.
The defendant filed a “Habeas Corpus Motion” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Doc. 33. The Court referred the action to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark A Moreno, Doe. 36. Magistrate Moreno submitted his Report and Recommendations, Doc. 37, to the Court on January 27, 1998. A copy of the Report and Recommendations was served upon the plaintiff and defendant as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636. Defendant has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendations.
The Court has made a de novo determination that the findings and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michael Hoggard v. James Purkett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fiebelkorn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Perry v. PeopleSuperior Court of Guam · 2021