Legal Opinion

Michael Hoggard v. James Purkett, Superintendent

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1994No. 93-2403PublishedCited by 287 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Michael Hoggard appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his motion for appointment of counsel in his habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Hoggard argues that there should be a constitutional right to counsel in habeas proceedings and that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to appoint counsel in this ease. We affirm.

On February 27, 1991, Hoggard entered a plea of guilty in the circuit court of St. Louis County, Missouri, to five state charges of felony stealing, passing bad cheeks, and passing bad checks as a persistent offender.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by287 opinions

  1. William Smith v. Secretary of New Mexico Department of Corrections Derald Kerby, Warden, Central New Mexico Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Dana Blum, United States of America v. Chester BlumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Christopher Martin v. John FayramCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. Richard Dennis Oxford v. Paul DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API