Legal Opinion

Kingston Constructors, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 7, 1996No. Civil Action 95-02097PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. 1 Plaintiff appeals from, a decision by the Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals (“the Board”), denying its claim for an equitable adjustment in the price of a contract to replace certain electrical transformers utilized in defendant’s rail system. Defendant asks this Court to grant summary affirmance of the Board’s decision.

BACKGROUND

This case involves a contract between defendant Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority (“WMATA”) and plaintiff Kingston Constructors,.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Granite Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Rattigan v. Commodore International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Granite-Groves v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Ashcraft & Gerel v. Coady, EdwardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  3. Robins Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Associated Rigging & Hauling Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API