United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v. Rowe
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the deputy commissioner and the Florida Industrial Commission held successively that the claimant, Alpha Omega Rowe, the respondent here, was entitled to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.
Respondent was employed by one of the appellants as a teacher in a nursery school. One of her duties was to act in a supervisory capacity during the absence on vacation of the regular supervisor and to collect certain nursery fees. On the Friday before the injury occurred, respondent had…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arkin Construction Company v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Industrial Commission v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Bowen v. KeenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Glasser v. Youth ShopSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nikko Gold Coast Cruises v. GullifordSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- El Viejo Arco Iris, Inc. v. LuacesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Everett Ford Co. v. LaneySupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Swartz v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Swartz v. McDonald's Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.