People v. Sipress
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
Convicted after a jury trial of sale of cocaine in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11352, appellant contends that the trial court improperly permitted a defense witness to refuse to answer various questions asked of him by claiming the Fifth Amendment privilege. He argues that: (1) the witness was immunized from prosecution by Health and Safety Code section 11367; and (2) the prosecution was required to grant immunity to the witness pursuant to Penal Code section 1324 to preserve appellant’s right to a fair trial. Concluding that the record does not establish…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Prudhomme v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. TraylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. SutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. Darrell T.California Court of Appeal · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.