People v. Sutter
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CONKLIN, J. *
Appellant, Michael Claud Sutter, and Archie May-hew (not a party to this appeal) were charged with violation of Penal Code section 211, robbery. There were special allegations that Mayhew used a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12022.5) and that appellant was armed as a principal (Pen. Code, § 12022 subd. (a)).
Thereafter, the court accepted defendant Mayhew’s guilty plea to robbery in count I (Pen. Code, § 211) without any special allegations. Mayhew had not been sentenced at the time of appellant’s trial.
Appellant was convicted of robbery and the jury made a true finding that he was…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. LindbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.