Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Campbell

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 22, 2021No. 8:20-cv-00812Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RONALD TIMMONS, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No.: PWG-20-812 CASEY M. CAMPBELL, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION In an amended response to this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Respondents assert that the petition is subject to dismissal because it raises procedurally defaulted claims which are otherwise without merit. ECF No. 10 (Supplemental Answer). Petitioner Ronald Timmons filed a reply. ECF No. 11. No hearing is necessary to determine matters pending before the Court. See Rule 8(a), Rules…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API