Legal Opinion
Richard Mulligan v. George Schultz, Secretary of State, and the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1988No. 87-1666PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
The appellants are sixty-two aliens who brought suit to redress decisions by United States consular officers not to accept their applications for immigration visas, proffered to various consular officers at posts outside our Country. These administrative decisions were based on the regulations promulgated by the Secretary of State implementing Section 314 of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. The district court dismissed the appellants’ action with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court rested its holding on the doctrine of consular…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Romeo v. Centeno and Bruce A. Coane v. George P. Shultz, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by20 opinions
- Patel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Matter of Meyerland Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 447, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 605 Jyotika Patel Mohanbhai Patel v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Clifton J. Rogers, Ins, Acting District Director, Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Van Ravenswaay v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.