Legal Opinion

Romeo v. Centeno and Bruce A. Coane v. George P. Shultz, Secretary of State

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1987No. 87-2133PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Romeo Centeno and Bruce Coane appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their lawsuit against the appellees. Because we find that the consular officer’s decision to deny Centeno a visa to enter this country was not reviewable by a federal court, we affirm the dismissal of the appellants’ lawsuit.

Romeo Centeno, a citizen of the Philippines, applied for a visitor’s visa to the United States on or around April 1, 1986. This application was denied by a consular official at the United States Embassy in Manila. Despite further efforts on behalf of Centeno by his brother-in-law, Bruce Coane, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Te Kuei Liu v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Roberto Saavedra Bruno,appellants v. Madeleine K. Albright, Secretary of State,appelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Farah Naz Ahmed v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. City of New York Bruce Cronin v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. Adams v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Margaret J. Randall v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API