Legal Opinion

Alo, LLC v. Sean Fang, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 15, 2026No. 3:25-cv-11126Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 ALO, LLC, Case No. 25-cv-11126-PHK 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING ALO LLC’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE 10 v. TO SERVE THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA 11 SEAN FANG, et al., Re: Dkt. 16 Defendants. 12 13 Now before the Court is Plaintiff Alo, LLC’s (“Alo”) Ex Parte Application for Leave to 14 Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference. [Dkt. 16]. Because Defendants 15 kyy_40 and Sean Fang (“Fang”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have not been identified or served, no 16 opposition has been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  4. Wakefield v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API