Michael Nichols v. Guillermo Fernandez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiffs Michael Nichols, Mindy Nichols, and Georgia Nichols appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, Palm Springs police officers Gil Fernandez, Rae Fernandez, and Matthew Beard. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we repeat only those facts necessary to resolve the issues raised on appeal.
1. Defendants did not violate Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights.
Plaintiffs claim that Defendants violated their due process rights by exposing them to danger. Under the state-created…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jones v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kennedy v. City of RidgefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Millinder v. HudginsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Przybysz v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017