Timmons v. Hecker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*763Trial Term correctly denied the motion by plaintiff’s counsel to strike the testimony of the pathologist and toxicologist based on defendant’s failure to disclose the names of those witnesses during discovery. The toxicologist and pathologist testified as expert witnesses; as such, their names would ordinarily not be discoverable (see, Kincaid v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 79 AD2d 1094,1095; Siegel, NY Prac § 349). Moreover, the toxicologist’s report was independently admissible under County Law § 674 (3) (b) (see also, Short v Ohland Meat Corp., 108 Misc 2d 338 [Niehoff, J.]). As to any purported…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CapersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Short v. Louis Ohland Meat Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jasopersaud v. Tao Gyoun RhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Fleischer v. Melmarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Hamilton v. WeinNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- Johnson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Mikos v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.