Legal Opinion
Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 1981No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: In this personal injury action predicated upon theories of negligence, breach of warranty and products liability, plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion to strike a certain interrogatory which requires her to identify the alleged defects in an automotive battery which exploded, together with the name of her expert witnesses and the nature of the alleged defect which each witness is expected to address at trial. Plaintiff’s moving affidavits aver that her answer to the interrogatory identifies the defects as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coley v. Michelin Tire Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Cepin v. CepinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Cornachio v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Fisher v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hennigan v. Buffalo Courier Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Thibodeau v. Rob Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Lobatto v. LobattoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Timmons v. HeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Valet v. American Motors Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.