Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Wein

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Nicholas A. Clemente, J.

In an action to recover for medical malpractice, plaintiff moves for a protective order as against the discovery and inspection demand of Caponegro which requests expert witness information.

Since this is an action commenced after July 1, 1985, which is the trigger date for the amendment to the CPLR as it relates to the disclosure of experts, this issue warrants inquiry. Defendant Caponegro’s notice for discovery and inspection dated March 12, 1986, requests in items Nos. 1, 2 and 5, the following:

1. The field of discipline of study in which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Molinari v. Conforti & Eisele, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Timmons v. HeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jasopersaud v. Tao Gyoun RhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Pizzi v. MucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Saar v. Brown & Odabashian, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1988
  4. McGoldrick v. Whitney M. Young, Jr. Health Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Deitch v. MayNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API