Legal Opinion

Garland v. Craven

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1944No. Appeal, 92PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

Equitable Life Assurance Society issued a group life insurance policy to Heyl & Patterson, insuring such of their employees as elected to participate. Albert E. Craven, on becoming an employee, so elected and on July 2, 1912 the insurance company issued to him a certificate under said policy insuring him in the amount of $1,800 payable at his death to “Sarah E. Craven, wife”, the person designated by him as his beneficiary in his written election to participate in said group insurance. There was nothing in the policy or the certificate which restricted his choice of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Trainer v. FortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Baxter v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Overbeck v. OverbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. StitzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. MessierDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Slavin v. SlavinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Bynum v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
  5. Orth v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API