Legal Opinion

Orth v. Wood

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1946No. Appeal, 81PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

This is the somewhat familiar case of a man purchasing a property with his own funds, putting title in the name of his wife or mistress, and, after a quarrel with her, attempting to regain ownership by claiming a resulting or constructive trust.

Plaintiff, Cloyd Orth, a widower, on April 9, 1941, entered into a meretricious relationship with defendant, Viola Wood, a married woman. At first they lived together at 2106 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, hut on April 28, 1942, plaintiff purchased premises 930 W. Dauphin Street, taking title in the name of “Viola…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garland v. CravenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Hendricks v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Arcutt v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and EnginemenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Masgai v. MasgaiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Keene v. KeeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bohaker v. KoudelkaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  4. Philo v. Rought, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1954
  5. Keene v. KeeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API