Legal Opinion

Groatz v. Day

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 6, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The defendant employed one Jackson, in consideration of the ride, to take the former’s automobile from Danville to a garage at Exeter for repairs. Jackson was charged with no other duties for the defendant. Upon his arrival at the garage, finding the mechanician engaged, Jackson drove about town and returned later, when it was determined that the repairs would require new parts which could not be obtained for some days. He thereupon went to Little Boar’s Head in North Hampton solely for a ride for himself and a friend who had accompanied him on the trip. This took him in the opposite…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Danforth v. FisherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  2. Dearborn v. FullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  2. Utica Mutual Insurance v. LangevinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Bowen v. SoucyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1933
  4. Travelers Insurance v. MarcouxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API