Legal Opinion

Zehman Construction Co. v. Eastlake

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1962No. 692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkeel, J.

This appeal comes to this court on questions of law from a judgment for the defendants-appellees entered by the Common Pleas Court of Lake County. The action is one *365seeking a declaratory judgment to tbe effect that a “tap-in charge” ordinance, preventing connections to a sanitary sewer located in the public street on which plaintiff’s several lots (19 in number) face until a “tap-in charge” of $350.00 per connection is paid, is void as contrary to law and unconstitutional on the undisputed facts of this case.

The plaintiff and its predecessors in title to the property in an allotment…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Strahan v. City of AuroraPortage County Court of Common Pleas · 1973
  3. Englewood Hills, Inc. v. Village of EnglewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API