In re Clark
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law!
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam : .; Arthur E. Clark was. prohibited from practicing law by an order of this courkéntered October 11, 1905, and the order was affirmed by the Court of Appeals in March following. ' (184 N. Y. 222.) He has applied for reinstatement as ail .attorney¡and-counselor upon his petition, verified March 14,1908, and accompanies the sanie with letters from many lawyers and laymen advising Iiis restoration'to practice, and, letters and statements in opposition are presented on ithe hearing of the application. '. The charges against Mr. Clark were of very grave import. We need not enumerate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In re the Proceedings for Disbarment of ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re StumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.